"What are we aiming at?”
That’s the question our first president, Daniel Coit Gilman, asked at his inauguration in 1876. What is this place all about, exactly? His answer:
"The encouragement of research . . . and the advancement of individual scholars, who by their excellence will advance the sciences they pursue, and the society where ...
Read more about this company
Job ID: 2026-7619
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to hire a Research Data Manager 1, who will work on the design, management, and execution of all quantitative, monitoring and evaluation (MEL), and methodological components of the Impact Evaluation.
- The role serves as the technical backbone of the evaluation, responsible for ensuring that quantitative findings are valid, reproducible, and methodologically defensible.
- Working closely with the Jhpiego team, this role will translate evaluation questions into robust analytical approaches, manage quantitative datasets, analyze data, generate scorecards, dashboards, and statistical outputs that demonstrate before–after change, contribution, and systems-level impact of C19RM investments.
Responsibilities
Quantitative Evaluation Design & Methods:
- Lead development of the quantitative evaluation approach, including before–and–after and quasi-experimental comparisons where feasible.
- Support refinement of the evaluation framework, theory of change, and indicator matrix.
- Define sampling strategies, inclusion criteria, and analytical assumptions for quantitative components.
- Ensure alignment of indicators with C19RM modules, national frameworks, and donor expectations.
Monitoring, Evaluation & Indicator Management:
- Serve as the MEL lead for the Impact Evaluation.
- Develop and manage the indicator reference matrix, including definitions, data sources, baselines, and comparison points.
- Ensure consistency and traceability of indicators across datasets, analysis outputs, and reporting.
- Establish and document data quality assurance (DQA) processes, including validation, triangulation, and audit trails.
Data Management & Quality Assurance:
- Oversee quantitative data collection workflows and ensure adherence to protocols.
- Lead data cleaning, validation, and management across multiple sources (routine data, program datasets, surveys).
- Ensure reproducibility of analyses through well-documented datasets and code.
- Identify and address data gaps, biases, and limitations in collaboration with the Team Lead.
Statistical Analysis & Evidence Generation:
- Conduct or oversee statistical analyses, including descriptive analysis, trend analysis, and comparative assessments.
- Generate quantitative outputs such as:
- Domain-specific scorecards
- Tables and figures
- Dashboards and visual summaries
- Interpret findings in collaboration with the Team Lead and qualitative research lead.
- Clearly articulate strengths, limitations, and confidence levels of findings.
Collaboration & Technical Support:
- Provide technical guidance to Research Supervisors and field teams on quantitative tools and data requirements.
- Work closely with the Qualitative Research Manager to ensure integration and triangulation of findings.
- Support the Team Lead in responding to technical queries during validation and review processes.
- Contribute quantitative inputs to technical briefs and presentations as required.
Contribution to Manuscript Development:
- Lead development of quantitative methods sections, statistical analyses, tables, and figures for manuscripts.
- Ensure transparency, reproducibility, and accurate interpretation of quantitative findings.
- Contribute to the results and methods sections and respond to technical reviewer comments related to data and analysis.
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Master’s degree or higher in Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Statistics, Health Economics, Evaluation Science, or a closely related quantitative field.
- 7–10 years’ experience in quantitative research, MEL, or impact evaluation within health or development programs.
- Demonstrated experience designing and implementing impact or quasi-experimental evaluations.
- Strong experience working with large routine health datasets and programmatic data.
- Proven ability to deliver high-quality analytical outputs under tight timelines.
- Experience with donor-funded programs and national health systems is strongly preferred.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Quantitative Analysis & MEL Tools:
- Statistical software: STATA (preferred), R, SPSS, or equivalent
- Data management & analysis: Advanced Microsoft Excel (pivot tables, Power Query, complex formulas)
- Dashboards & visualization: Power BI, Tableau, or equivalent (hands-on experience preferred)
Health Information Systems:
- Interpretive and analytical experience with:
- DHIS2
- Routine surveillance and health management information systems
Documentation & Collaboration:
- Microsoft Word (technical documentation and annexes)
- Microsoft PowerPoint (analytical presentations)
- Familiarity with collaborative platforms (SharePoint, Teams, Google Workspace)
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong grounding in evaluation methodology and statistical reasoning.
- High attention to data quality, documentation, and reproducibility.
- Ability to explain complex quantitative findings to non-technical audiences.
- Strong problem-solving and analytical thinking skills.
- Ability to work independently while coordinating closely with senior technical leadership.
- Excellent time management and ability to deliver under pressure.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Research Manager I is accountable for the technical accuracy, integrity, and reproducibility of all quantitative findings generated for the Impact Evaluation.
- All quantitative evidence must withstand technical scrutiny and support defensible conclusions regarding program impact and contribution.
go to method of application »
Job ID: 2026-7620
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to hire a Research Data Manager II – to work on Impact Evaluation for C19RM grant alongside the Jhpiego team to focus on Qualitative Analysis, Coordination & Synthesis. H/She will contribute to all qualitative research, field coordination, and integrative synthesis activities for the Impact Evaluation.
- The role is responsible for ensuring that qualitative inquiry is methodologically sound, field implementation is well-coordinated, and findings are systematically analyzed and synthesized to explain how and why observed changes occurred.
- Working closely with the evaluation team, this role will manage qualitative evidence generation, and support coherent interpretation of findings across data sources, translating field-level evidence and stakeholder perspectives into clear analytical narratives that strengthen attribution, contribution, and overall evaluation conclusions.
Responsibilities
Qualitative Evaluation Design & Methods:
- Lead the design of qualitative components of the Impact Evaluation, including KIIs, FGDs, Case studies, document reviews, and observation protocols.
- Develop and refine qualitative data collection tools aligned with evaluation questions and theory of change.
- Ensure qualitative methods support interpretation of before–after change, contribution, and system-level effects.
- Establish coding frameworks and analytical approaches in line with evaluation objectives
Field Coordination & Evaluation Operations:
- Lead coordination of all field-based activities for the Impact Evaluation, including scheduling, sequencing, and supervision.
- Oversee Research Supervisors to ensure consistent application of protocols, ethical standards, and data quality requirements.
- Coordinate stakeholder engagement at national and state levels for interviews, site visits, and validations.
- Troubleshoot operational challenges and escalate critical risks to the Team Lead in a timely manner.
Qualitative Data Management & Analysis:
- Oversee transcription, coding, and organization of qualitative data.
- Conduct or supervise thematic analysis using systematic and transparent analytical approaches.
- Ensure credibility of findings through triangulation, saturation checks, and documentation of analytical decisions.
- Identify patterns, explanations, and contextual factors that clarify quantitative results.
Intellectual Synthesis:
- Lead initial synthesis of findings across qualitative streams, identifying key narratives, mechanisms of change, and unintended effects.
- Support the Team Lead in interrogating assumptions, refining interpretations, and strengthening attribution arguments.
- Prepare structured analytical memos summarizing emerging findings and implications.
- Act as the primary intellectual bridge between field evidence, subject matter expert inputs, and quantitative results.
Collaboration & Technical Support:
- Work closely with the Quantitative, MEL & Methods Research Manager to integrate qualitative and quantitative findings.
- Support triangulation across data sources to ensure coherent and defensible conclusions.
- Provide inputs into validation workshops and respond to technical feedback related to qualitative findings.
- Coordinate with the Program Specialist to ensure smooth flow of drafts, reviews, and revisions.
Contribution to Manuscript Development:
- Lead development of qualitative methods and findings sections, including thematic analyses and explanatory narratives.
- Integrate qualitative insights with quantitative findings to strengthen interpretation and discussion.
- Support drafting of discussion sections and address reviewer feedback related to qualitative rigor and synthesis.
Supervises:
- Supports Research Supervisors and Interviewers on qualitative components
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Master’s degree or higher in Public Health, Social Sciences, Anthropology, Development Studies, Evaluation Science, or a related field.
- Minimum of 7–10 years’ experience in qualitative research, evaluation, or learning-focused roles within health or development programs.
- Demonstrated experience leading qualitative components of large-scale or national evaluations.
- Proven experience coordinating multi-site or multi-state field research activities.
- Strong experience synthesizing qualitative evidence for donor-facing impact evaluations.
- Familiarity with Nigeria’s health system and donor-funded programs is strongly preferred.
- Proven ability to deliver high-quality analytical outputs under tight timelines.
- Experience with donor-funded programs and national health systems is strongly preferred.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Evaluation, Analysis & Data Tools:
- Qualitative analysis: NVivo, ATLAS.ti, or equivalent qualitative analysis software
- Quantitative analysis: STATA, R, SPSS, or equivalent statistical software (conceptual understanding required, hands-on use desirable)
Data Management & Collaboration:
- Microsoft Excel (advanced functions, pivot tables, data validation)
- Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, or similar collaboration platforms
- Digital data collection platforms (e.g., ODK, KoboToolbox) – interpretive or operational experience desirable
- Familiarity with DHIS2, SORMAS and routine health information systems (interpretive level)
Reporting & Knowledge Products:
- Microsoft Word (advanced formatting and track changes)
- Microsoft PowerPoint (analytic-level presentations)
- Experience reviewing or guiding development of infographics and visual products in collaboration with designers
- Familiarity with collaborative platforms (SharePoint, Teams, Google Workspace)
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong qualitative analytical and interpretive skills.
- Excellent ability to synthesize complex information into clear narratives.
- Strong organizational and coordination capabilities under tight timelines.
- High level of methodological judgment and attention to analytical rigor.
- Strong interpersonal skills and ability to engage senior stakeholders.
- Ability to work independently while maintaining close alignment with technical leadership.
- High tolerance for ambiguity and pressure in fast-paced evaluation environments.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Research Manager II – Qualitative Analysis, Coordination & Synthesis is accountable for the methodological rigor, credibility, and coherence of all qualitative evidence generated for the Impact Evaluation, as well as the effective coordination of field activities.
- This role is responsible for ensuring that qualitative findings meaningfully explain and contextualize quantitative results and contribute to defensible conclusions on program impact.
go to method of application »
Job ID: 2026-7621
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to engage Research Program Manager who will work with Jhpiego team on the Impact evaluation for the COVID-19 Response Mechanism (C19RM) grant in Nigeria. The C19 RM is a large-scale, multi-partner national investment to strengthen pandemic preparedness, emergency response, and resilient health systems across all 36 states.
- As the project concludes, Jhpiego will implement a national Impact Evaluation to generate evidence on the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability of C19RM investments.
- The Research Program Manager – will play a central role in ensuring that this complex, multi-state evaluation is well-planned, well-coordinated, and delivered on time and to the required quality standards, working under the strategic leadership of the technical lead and Project director.
- The Research Program Manager will provide operational, coordination, and process leadership for the C19RM Impact Evaluation, translating the evaluation design and strategic direction into clear workplans, coordinated execution, and disciplined delivery across all evaluation components.
- Ensuring technical excellence is matched by strong program management, enabling seamless collaboration among Technical Advisors, Survey Managers, Data Managers, field supervision teams, government counterparts, and external partners.
Responsibilities
Evaluation Management & Coordination:
- Manage day-to-day implementation of the Impact Evaluation workplan, tracking timelines, milestones, and deliverables.
- Coordinate inputs and workflows across the Team Lead, Research Managers, SMEs, and field teams.
- Ensure alignment between technical activities, reporting timelines, and validation processes.
- Identify implementation risks and proactively escalate issues that may affect quality or timelines.
Knowledge Management & Technical Editing:
- Coordinate development of evaluation reports, manuscripts, briefs, and presentations.
- Harmonize technical inputs from Data Managers and SMEs into coherent, consistent drafts.
- Lead technical editing to ensure clarity, consistency, and alignment with donor or publication standards.
- Maintain version control and document management for all evaluation outputs.
Support to Technical Leadership & Quality Assurance:
- Support the Team Lead in preparing briefing notes, synthesis summaries, and review materials.
- Track technical comments and coordinate structured responses and revisions.
- Serve as an internal quality-control layer to ensure outputs meet professional and donor expectations before submission.
- Support preparation and documentation of validation workshops and technical review meetings.
Stakeholder & Process Management:
- Coordinate logistics, agendas, and documentation for stakeholder engagements related to the Impact Evaluation.
- Support communication and follow-up with government counterparts, partners, and reviewers as directed.
- Ensure compliance with organizational systems, templates, and processes relevant to the evaluation.
- Facilitate smooth information flow between internal teams and external stakeholders.
Manuscript & Knowledge Product Development:
- Coordinate manuscript development processes, including timelines, author contributions, and version control.
- Support harmonization of technical inputs into manuscripts and learning products.
- Ensure manuscripts and knowledge products are formatted and packaged according to target journal or donor requirements.
- Track and coordinate responses to reviewer or stakeholder feedback related to manuscripts.
Dissemination & Use of Findings:
- Lead coordination of dissemination of Impact Evaluation findings to national stakeholders, partners, and donors.
- Support development of dissemination products, including:
- Policy briefs
- Slide decks for validation and learning events
- Executive summaries and factsheets
- Coordinate dissemination workshops, learning events, and presentations in collaboration with the Team Lead.
- Ensure evaluation findings are packaged in formats suitable for different audiences (technical, policy, donor).
- Work with the Graphic Designer to ensure dissemination materials are visually clear, technically accurate, and audience appropriate.
- Support documentation of stakeholder feedback and learning uptake following dissemination activities.
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Master’s degree in public health, Development Studies, Social Sciences, Communications, or a related field.
- Minimum of 8–10 years’ experience in program management, survey/evaluation coordination, research management, or knowledge management within health or development programs.
- Demonstrated experience managing complex evaluations, learning studies, or donor-funded research projects.
- Strong familiarity with Jhpiego or similar INGO systems, processes, and reporting standards.
- Proven experience coordinating multidisciplinary technical teams under tight timelines.
- Experience supporting manuscript development or donor-facing publications is highly desirable.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Coordination & Project Management:
- Microsoft Excel (advanced tracking and coordination tools)
- Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or equivalent collaboration platforms
- SharePoint, Google Drive, or similar document management systems
Knowledge Management & Editing:
- Microsoft Word (advanced formatting, styles, and track changes)
- Microsoft PowerPoint (executive-level presentations)
- Familiarity with style guides and donor reporting standards
Visualization & Collaboration:
- Ability to work effectively with designers using tools such as Adobe InDesign or Illustrator (conceptual familiarity required; hands-on not mandatory)
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong program management and organizational skills.
- Excellent written communication and technical editing ability.
- High attention to detail, quality, and deadlines.
- Strong judgment in managing competing priorities and inputs.
- Ability to work independently while supporting senior technical leadership.
- Strong interpersonal and stakeholder coordination skills.
- Ability to operate effectively in fast-paced, high-pressure environments.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Program Manager – Impact Evaluation is accountable for the timely delivery, coherence, and quality readiness of all Impact Evaluation outputs.
- The role ensures that technical contributions are effectively coordinated, harmonized, and presented to meet donor, stakeholder, and publication standards.
go to method of application »
Job ID: 2026-7623
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to hire a Subject Matter Expert (SME) – Laboratory Systems, Diagnostics & Infection Prevention and Control (IPC), Health product supply chain, waste management will provide specialized technical expertise to the Impact Evaluation, focusing on C19RM investments that strengthened laboratory networks, diagnostic capacity, biosafety, biosecurity, genomic sequencing, health product supply chain, waste management and IPC systems at national and sub-national levels.
- The role ensures that evaluation planning, data collections, findings and resource development related to diagnostics, health product supply chain, waste management and IPC are technically sound, aligned with C19RM intent, and interpreted within the realities of health system capacity and pandemic preparedness.
- The SME will support technical framing, validation of findings, and interpretation of system-level impact and sustainability.
Responsibilities
Technical Framing of Evaluation Questions & Indicators
- Provide expert input into evaluation questions and indicators related to:
- Molecular and rapid diagnostic testing capacity (PCR, Ag-RDTs)
- Laboratory network expansion and functionality
- Turnaround time, sample referral systems, and quality assurance
- IPC readiness in laboratories and health facilities
- Ensure alignment of evaluation domains with C19RM laboratory and IPC modules.
Technical Review of Quantitative & Qualitative Findings:
- Review and validate quantitative findings related to:
- Testing capacity and coverage
- Laboratory throughput and utilization
- Distribution and availability of diagnostic commodities
- Review qualitative findings to assess:
- Health worker adherence to IPC protocols
- Biosafety and biosecurity practices
- Operational challenges in laboratory and IPC implementation
- Validate technical accuracy and flag inconsistencies or over-interpretation.
Interpretation of System-Level Impact & Sustainability:
- Assess the extent to which C19RM investments strengthened:
- Strengthened national and sub-national laboratory systems
- Improved diagnostic readiness for outbreaks beyond COVID-19
- Enhanced IPC practices and institutional culture.
- Advise on sustainability and integration of investments into routine laboratory and IPC systems.
Contribution to Synthesis & Reporting:
- Provide concise technical inputs for synthesis sections related to:
- Laboratory and diagnostics impact
- IPC systems strengthening
- Support the Team Lead and Senior Program Specialist in ensuring clarity and technical accuracy of narratives, tables, and figures.
- Participate in technical validation workshops and review discussions as required.
Contribution to Manuscript Development:
- Contribute technical content related to laboratory systems, diagnostics, and IPC strengthening.
- Review manuscript sections for accuracy of laboratory, biosafety, and IPC interpretations.
- Support articulation of preparedness and quality-of-care implications.
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Advanced degree in Medical Laboratory Sciences, Microbiology, Public Health, Epidemiology, or a related field.
- Minimum of 8–10 years’ experience in laboratory systems strengthening, diagnostics, or IPC within health systems.
- Demonstrated experience with:
- Molecular diagnostics and/or rapid diagnostic testing programs
- Laboratory quality management systems and accreditation processes
- IPC programming in health facilities or laboratory settings
- Strong familiarity with Global Fund C19RM investments related to laboratory systems, diagnostics, and IPC.
- Experience working with national laboratory networks, Ministries of Health, and development partners.
- Prior involvement in assessments, evaluations, or technical reviews is highly desirable.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Technical Domains:
- Laboratory network design and functionality
- Molecular diagnostics (PCR), antigen-based testing, and QA systems
- Biosafety, biosecurity, and IPC standards
- Sample referral and data reporting systems
Familiarity With:
- WHO guidance on laboratory testing and IPC
- National laboratory policies and IPC guidelines
- Global Fund laboratory and RSSH-related indicators
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong systems-thinking and analytical skills.
- Ability to interpret diagnostic and IPC data within complex health systems.
- Excellent technical communication and documentation skills.
- Ability to provide clear, evidence-based technical judgments.
- Strong collaboration skills in multidisciplinary evaluation teams.
- High attention to quality, accuracy, and methodological integrity.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Subject Matter Expert – Laboratory Systems, Diagnostics & IPC is accountable for the technical validity, credibility, and contextual interpretation of all evaluation findings related to laboratory and IPC investments.
- The SME ensures that conclusions accurately reflect system performance, preparedness gains, and sustainability considerations under C19RM.
go to method of application »
Job ID: 2026-7624
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to hire a Subject Matter Expert (SME) – Laboratory Systems, Diagnostics & Infection Prevention and Control (IPC), Health product supply chain, waste management will provide specialized technical expertise to the Impact Evaluation, focusing on C19RM investments that strengthened laboratory networks, diagnostic capacity, biosafety, biosecurity, genomic sequencing, health product supply chain, waste management and IPC systems at national and sub-national levels.
- The role ensures that evaluation planning, data collections, findings and resource development related to diagnostics, health product supply chain, waste management and IPC are technically sound, aligned with C19RM intent, and interpreted within the realities of health system capacity and pandemic preparedness. The SME will support technical framing, validation of findings, and interpretation of system-level impact and sustainability.
Responsibilities
Technical Framing of Evaluation Questions & Indicators
- Provide expert input into evaluation questions and indicators related to:
- Molecular and rapid diagnostic testing capacity (PCR, Ag-RDTs)
- Laboratory network expansion and functionality
- Turnaround time, sample referral systems, and quality assurance
- IPC readiness in laboratories and health facilities
- Ensure alignment of evaluation domains with C19RM laboratory and IPC modules.
Technical Review of Quantitative & Qualitative Findings:
- Review and validate quantitative findings related to:
- Testing capacity and coverage
- Laboratory throughput and utilization
- Distribution and availability of diagnostic commodities
- Review qualitative findings to assess:
- Health worker adherence to IPC protocols
- Biosafety and biosecurity practices
- Operational challenges in laboratory and IPC implementation
- Validate technical accuracy and flag inconsistencies or over-interpretation.
Interpretation of System-Level Impact & Sustainability:
- Assess the extent to which C19RM investments strengthened:
- Strengthened national and sub-national laboratory systems
- Improved diagnostic readiness for outbreaks beyond COVID-19
- Enhanced IPC practices and institutional culture.
- Advise on sustainability and integration of investments into routine laboratory and IPC systems.
Contribution to Synthesis & Reporting:
- Provide concise technical inputs for synthesis sections related to:
- Laboratory and diagnostics impact
- IPC systems strengthening
- Support the Team Lead and Senior Program Specialist in ensuring clarity and technical accuracy of narratives, tables, and figures.
- Participate in technical validation workshops and review discussions as required.
Contribution to Manuscript Development:
- Contribute technical content related to laboratory systems, diagnostics, and IPC strengthening.
- Review manuscript sections for accuracy of laboratory, biosafety, and IPC interpretations.
- Support articulation of preparedness and quality-of-care implications.
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Advanced degree in Medical Laboratory Sciences, Microbiology, Public Health, Epidemiology, or a related field.
- Minimum of 8–10 years’ experience in laboratory systems strengthening, diagnostics, or IPC within health systems.
- Demonstrated experience with:
- Molecular diagnostics and/or rapid diagnostic testing programs
- Laboratory quality management systems and accreditation processes
- IPC programming in health facilities or laboratory settings
- Strong familiarity with Global Fund C19RM investments related to laboratory systems, diagnostics, and IPC.
- Experience working with national laboratory networks, Ministries of Health, and development partners.
- Prior involvement in assessments, evaluations, or technical reviews is highly desirable.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Technical Domains:
- Laboratory network design and functionality
- Molecular diagnostics (PCR), antigen-based testing, and QA systems
- Biosafety, biosecurity, and IPC standards
- Sample referral and data reporting systems
Familiarity With:
- WHO guidance on laboratory testing and IPC
- National laboratory policies and IPC guidelines
- Global Fund laboratory and RSSH-related indicators
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong systems-thinking and analytical skills.
- Ability to interpret diagnostic and IPC data within complex health systems.
- Excellent technical communication and documentation skills.
- Ability to provide clear, evidence-based technical judgments.
- Strong collaboration skills in multidisciplinary evaluation teams.
- High attention to quality, accuracy, and methodological integrity.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Subject Matter Expert – Laboratory Systems, Diagnostics & IPC is accountable for the technical validity, credibility, and contextual interpretation of all evaluation findings related to laboratory and IPC investments.
- The SME ensures that conclusions accurately reflect system performance, preparedness gains, and sustainability considerations under C19RM.
go to method of application »
Job ID: 2026-7625
Overview
- Jhpiego is seeking to hire a Subject Matter Expert (SME)/Technical Advisor – Surveillance Systems Strengthening & ATM Mitigation that will provide specialized technical expertise to the Impact Evaluation, focusing on C19RM investments that strengthened disease surveillance, early warning systems, data flows, and use of information for public health action and the mitigation of C19 within HIV, TB and Malaria programs.
- The role is responsible for ensuring that evaluation findings related to surveillance and ATM mitigation are technically accurate, analytically sound, and interpreted within national preparedness and health security frameworks.
- This includes routine and emergency surveillance systems, public health emergency operations, and the translation of surveillance data into timely response.
Responsibilities
Technical Framing of Evaluation Questions & Indicators:
- Provide expert input into evaluation questions, indicators, and analytical priorities related to:
- Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR)
- Event-based and indicator-based surveillance
- Early warning and outbreak detection systems
- Public Health Emergency Operations Centers (PHEOCs)
- Ensure alignment of evaluation focus with C19RM surveillance investments and national surveillance strategies.
Technical Review of Quantitative & Qualitative Findings:
- Review quantitative findings related to:
- Surveillance coverage, completeness, and timeliness
- Reporting unit functionality and data submission
- Use of digital and routine information systems for surveillance
- Review qualitative findings to assess:
- Use of surveillance data for decision-making
- Coordination between surveillance, laboratories, and response units
- Operational strengths and bottlenecks in early warning systems
- Validate interpretations and flag over-attribution, data gaps, or methodological weaknesses.
Interpretation of System-Level Impact & Sustainability:
- Assess the extent to which C19RM investments contributed to:
- Strengthened national and sub-national surveillance capacity
- Improved detection and response readiness for outbreaks beyond COVID-19
- Integration of surveillance data into preparedness planning and response actions
Provide expert judgment on sustainability, including:
- Institutionalization of surveillance processes
- Data use culture and governance
- Linkages between surveillance, laboratories, and emergency response structures
Contribution to Synthesis & Reporting:
- Provide concise technical inputs for synthesis sections related to:
- Surveillance system strengthening and early warning
- Preparedness and response readiness
- Support the Team Lead and Senior Program Specialist in ensuring technical accuracy of narratives, tables, and figures.
- Participate in validation workshops, technical reviews, and interpretation discussions as required.
Contribution to Manuscript Development:
- Contribute technical inputs on surveillance systems, early warning, and data use for action.
- Review interpretation of surveillance indicators and system performance.
- Support discussion on preparedness, response readiness, and integration with national systems.
Other Duties:
- Perform any other duties assigned by the supervisor in line with the Impact Evaluation deliverable.
Required Qualifications
- Advanced degree in Public Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Health Information Systems, or a related field.
- Minimum of 8–10 years’ experience in disease surveillance, health information systems, or public health preparedness.
- Demonstrated experience with:
- IDSR or equivalent surveillance systems
- Event-based surveillance and early warning mechanisms
- Surveillance data analysis and use for public health action
- Strong familiarity with Global Fund C19RM surveillance investments and preparedness priorities.
- Experience working with Ministries of Health, public health institutes, or emergency operations structures.
- Prior involvement in assessments, evaluations, or system reviews is highly desirable.
Required Technical Skills & Software Proficiency:
Technical Domains:
- Disease surveillance systems and early warning mechanisms
- IDSR, event-based surveillance, and outbreak investigation
- Public health emergency coordination and preparedness planning
- Surveillance–response linkages
Familiarity With:
- WHO guidance on surveillance and health security
- National surveillance strategies and preparedness plans
- Global Fund RSSH and surveillance-related indicators
Knowledge, Skills & Competencies:
- Strong analytical and systems-thinking skills.
- Ability to interpret surveillance data within complex health systems.
- Excellent technical communication and synthesis skills.
- Ability to provide clear, evidence-based technical judgments.
- Strong collaboration skills within multidisciplinary evaluation teams.
- High professional integrity and sensitivity to contextual constraints.
Key Accountability Statement:
- The Subject Matter Expert – Surveillance Systems & Early Warning is accountable for the technical credibility, analytical rigor, and contextual interpretation of all evaluation findings related to surveillance and early warning investments.
- The SME ensures conclusions accurately reflect system performance, preparedness gains, and sustainability considerations under C19RM.
Method of Application
Use the link(s) below to apply on company website.
Build your CV for free. Download in different templates.